Jane Street Invests $567M to Lift India Trading Restrictions

## Jane Street’s Trading Suspension and Fund Deposit

Bengaluru — The US-based high-frequency trading firm Jane Street has found itself at the center of scrutiny for alleged market manipulation by Indian regulatory authorities. In response, the company has deposited $567 million into an escrow account to facilitate its return to trading activities.

### SEBI’s Actions and Requirements

Recently, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) imposed restrictions on Jane Street, prohibiting the firm from engaging in the purchase or sale of securities within the Indian market. This action included a freeze on $567 million of the company’s funds. Jane Street is now permitted to resume trading only after an equal amount is deposited in a regulatory account, which SEBI will oversee until its investigation concludes.

### Ongoing Investigations

On Monday, SEBI confirmed that the deposit had been made, and it is currently reviewing Jane Street’s appeal to lift the trading restrictions. The firm has communicated to its employees its intention to contest the allegations, emphasizing that the trading practices in question were standard operations for index arbitrage.

“The funds have been deposited in good faith. Jane Street is committed to disputing the order and will submit a formal response addressing the allegations in the coming weeks,” stated a source close to the matter.

### Future Trading Plans

The timeline for Jane Street’s return to trading remains uncertain. According to sources, the firm will refrain from trading in Indian options while the ongoing dispute is unresolved. These sources, however, remain anonymous due to the sensitivity of the situation.

READ Data Centre Advancements in Brazil, India, and South Africa

### Allegations from SEBI

SEBI claims that Jane Street engaged in practices intended to create an artificial lift in the Bank Nifty index during morning trading sessions. The firm allegedly purchased substantial amounts of index constituents in both cash and futures markets, while simultaneously taking large short positions in index options, which were either exercised or allowed to expire later in the trading day.

Additionally, SEBI is expanding its investigation to cover other indices and exchanges, having monitored Jane Street’s trading activities for over two years.

What do you think about the implications of these allegations on high-frequency trading practices?